- About SGS
- Services and Projects
- What's New
- SGS Awards
- Publications and Papers
- Staff Presentations and Papers
- AITPM National Conference Paper & Presentation
- Housing supply and prices in Melbourne growth areas
- Melbourne's Economy: A Stunning Success or Captured by Complacency
- National Urban Policy : Challenges & Ideas
- Prosperity 2030 - Collaborative Development and Investment
- Quantifying Economic Impact: An Art and a Science
- SGS Submission VCEC Inquiry
- Capitalising on community
- Engagement is key to good community planning
- Indigenous Public Policy - closing the rhetorical gap
- For economic development practitioners, collaboration may be the best form of innovation
- Integrating Transport and Land Use Planning
- Privatisation - what can make it successful?
- The Making of the Poly-Centric State
- Christchurch's future
- 36 Million - Fact or Fiction?
- Abbotsford Convent Evolution
- Australian Settlement Futures
- How research institutions can help facilitate economic development
- Innovation in affordable housing
- Older Presentations and Papers
- Urbecon
- Staff Presentations and Papers
- Events
- SGS Team
- Careers
- Contact Us
Closing the Gap: Understanding Five Essential Foundations for Practical Change
With respect to the wellbeing of Indigenous people in Australia, at the moment there are two agendas running parallel to each other — the ‘Closing the Gap’ agenda and the 'Human Rights' agenda.
The ‘Closing the Gap’ agenda is technocratic and focussed on delivering what is often called a ‘mainstream’ standard of health, education and economic development for Indigenous people. In practice, so far the ‘Closing the Gap’ agenda is effectively ‘top down, driven by the state (primarily the goals of the Australian Government). As such, there is little allowance for Indigenous worldviews and culture in the programs and projects that target gap closure.
The 'Human Rights' agenda focuses on the rights of Indigenous people to play a major role in determining their futures for themselves, projecting their own visions of economic, social and cultural development. The Human Rights agenda is effectively ‘bottom up’, and as such is hindered by a lack of legitimacy for this agenda in the eyes of the state, and the general disempowerment of Indigenous people. In most of the current versions of state-sponsored Indigenous development policy, there remains an implicit suspicion that Indigenous culture is an impediment to development.
The presentation argues that these two agendas can be bridged together by a more explicit inclusion of culture in programs and projects that are designed to improve Indigenous well-being. There is a growing body of evidence that directly connects the practice and inclusion of culture to the well-being of Indigenous peoples, and that cultural well-being is a condition precedent to successful development. By definition, the inclusion of culture in ‘Closing the Gap’ policy, program and project development requires the involvement of Indigenous people in that task. This enables the opportunity for a practical expression of rights.
Download presentation
